Delivering Innovation in Public Institutions

Advanced Module, Newspeak House 2024-25

Andreas Varotsis

Welcome!

Aims for today

  • Introduction to the module content
  • Some group decisions
  • A case study from me

About Me

  • Operational policing and crime background
  • Lots of work around community tech innovation
  • Focus on impact evaluation
  • Now work in central govt

Module Overview

Module Aims

  • Focus is not on building innovation (covered in plenty of other modules)
  • Instead, we’ll look at how to implement innovation (and when it fails)
    • Implementation and delivery
    • Pushback, internal and external
    • Incentives and pushback
    • Implementation delivery challenges that can kill good ideas.

Linked Modules

Structure

  • Attend Meetups and Events: I’ll mantain a list of government innovation associated meetups. You should attend at least 1 of these, and share notes and reflections with the group
  • Case Study Discussion Sessions: As a group, we’ll select 2-3 examples of innovation as case studies, to read up and discuss
  • Online Discussion Platform: Space for ongoing conversations, article sharing, and reflection.

Decisions for today!

Online Content

  • Where do you want online stuff?
    • Slack
    • Discord
    • WhatsApp
    • Others?
  • Consider what works best for interaction, notifications, and accessibility.

In Person - Where and When?

  • I’ll aim to pencil in the next event for the end of this year.
  • Every 6-8 weeks?
  • Case studies 4 weeks in advance

Case Studies

  • I’ll suggest a few interesting case studies…
  • But you should also come up with your own!
  • We’ll aim to select the first in the next couple of weeks

Case Studies

Finding case studies

  • I’ve listed a few potential case studies in the module guide. These include
    • GOV.UK
    • NHS Horizon
    • Healthcare.gov
    • X-Road
  • but I’d encourage you to think beyond the technical! For example…

Case Study 1 - Sortition in Ancient Athens

Sortition in Ancient Athens

  • Innovation: Random selection of officials.
  • Time Period: Classical Athens, circa 5th century BCE.
  • Aim: Reduce the power of elites and increase representation.
  • Why It Was Innovative: Sortition was a radical approach to ensure equal opportunity and fairness, promoting democracy by reducing elite influence.
  • Outcome: Despite its democratic intent, sortition faced significant resistance from powerful elites and gradually faded as societies favored expertise and elections over random selection.

Key Resources

Case Study 2 - Pneumatic Tube Mail Systems

Pneumatic Tube Mail Systems

  • Innovation: Pneumatic tubes for fast mail delivery.
  • Time Period: Late 19th to early 20th century.
  • Cities: New York, Paris, London.
  • Why It Was Innovative: The pneumatic tube system was an exciting and novel way to move mail quickly, reflecting significant ingenuity in urban logistics.
  • Outcome: The system eventually became obsolete due to rising mail volumes and the advent of better communication technologies, such as telephones and electronic mail.

Key Resources

Case Study 3 - Metric System Implementation in the U.S.

Metric System Implementation in the U.S.

  • Innovation: Standardized metric system.
  • Aim: Align U.S. with global measurement systems.
  • Challenges: Cultural resistance.
  • Why It Was Innovative: The metric system offered a universal, rational standard that could have streamlined commerce, science, and daily life.
  • Outcome: Despite its advantages, the metric system faced strong cultural resistance in the U.S., where the familiarity and tradition of customary units prevailed, leading to only partial adoption.

Key Resources

Case Study 4 - Proportional Representation in the UK

Proportional Representation in the UK

  • Innovation: Align vote percentages with seat allocation.
  • Aim: Fairer electoral representation.
  • Challenges: Political resistance.
  • Why It Was Innovative: PR aimed to provide a more equitable electoral system, ensuring that the representation in government matched the popular vote more closely.
  • Outcome: The introduction of PR faced significant resistance from entrenched political interests that benefited from the existing first-past-the-post system, leading to limited adoption in the UK.

Key Resources

And more!

  • There are plenty of other suggested case studies in the module handbook
  • We’ll aim to highlight a few, and identify suggested reading, in the next few weeks